Dave S was loud once again at the Carson Nugget. We were there for the Northern Nevada premiere of Aaron Russo’s documentary America: From Freedom to Fascism.There were several tables of people there eating before the movie. I must confess I was kind of glad he was sitting near me, because I anticipated that he would launch into another anti-immigrant screed. I didn’t care if I was the only pro-immigrant person in the room. If he wanted a verbal
confrontation, I would give it to him.
He Did.
It was his usual diatribe. He argued with the fallacy of the “mature economy” and large population today that somehow cannot absorb more immigrants…even though Americans are not reproducing with large families and indeed we can accept more people easily. He asks why the Mexicans should have preference over Asians who must wait “simply because they are born close to the border”. Of course accidents of birth are an important factor in determining rights and opportunities. His accident of birth in being born in the USA, by that logic, should not determine his status either. Besides, the argument that Mexicans ( as a generic term for Latinos) should not be allowed entry when others have to wait is an argument for eliminating quotas and waits for everyone, not an argument for equality of restrictions on liberty.
The natural control on immigration is of course to eliminate the welfare state, if not the state itself, and make the distinction between immigrant worker and citizen clearer. Let those who come to work, work. Allow those who truly wish to remain and be citizens of the US have a clear path to that. Get the government out of the schools and health care and the labor markets so that the market place can allocate these resources. End the war on drugs and return to a non-interventionist foreign policy to minimize crime and terrorism associated with international travel. Stop the inane reliance on papers, ids and return to community policing and awareness as the proper method of discovering potential criminals and terrorists.
Since Republicans and Democrats have no intention of doing any of these things, it is left to the Libertarians alone to propose them.
But what really gets me is Dave S is convinced he is a free market economic thinker. He says he met Milton Friedman. But, he must not have read “Free to Choose” , wherein Friedman calls protective tariffs or restrictions on the free immigration of persons an “illogical rationalization” and where he even quotes the immortal inscription on the Statue of Liberty and states “They came by the millions, and by the millions they were absorbed. They prospered because they were left to their own devices.”
In similar fashion Dave S says he met Ayn Rand and thinks that qualifies him to understand Libertarian thought. That Ayn Rand is only one Libertarian among many, many great free market thinkers is lost to him. That her accomplishments must be measured against the cult of personality she created around herself is also not understood by him. The current Objectivists are thankfully not all Libertarians, and not all Libertarians by far are Objectivists. Murray Rothbard called them “Randroids” because of their slavish, almost programmed devotion to Ms. Rand. And, Ayn Rand herself was an immigrant, who fled both the Communists of her Russian Homeland and the Fascists of Italy.
Dave S, once again, illustrated the difference between a conservative and a libertarian. He cannot help but think in collective terms, and therefore is a socialist. His socialism is of the right, and regards the nation state as the great collective that the individual must absorb into. The left socialist thinks of the collective as a class distinction, of rich vs. poor. Both are antithetical to libertarian beliefs, as we regard the individual as an end in himself, and deny that any collective, whether nationalist or based on class or race, is more important than the
individual person.